What should evaluators avoid discussing during a JEPES evaluation?

During a JEPES evaluation, it is crucial for evaluators to focus on relevant and concrete information that can support an accurate assessment of the junior enlisted member's performance. Discussing inconclusive and irrelevant past performance details detracts from the evaluation process. Such information can lead to confusion and may misrepresent the individual’s current capabilities and achievements. Evaluators should concentrate on clear and measurable performance indicators that reflect the enlisted member's contributions, rather than unsubstantiated claims or outdated information that does not aid in the advancement or understanding of the member’s qualifications.

Focusing evaluations on relevant past performance details helps ensure that the feedback is constructive and aligned with the goals of the evaluation system, enabling fair and meaningful assessments that can inform future development.