What are the common pitfalls to avoid during the JEPES evaluation process?

The most significant common pitfall to avoid during the JEPES evaluation process is the lack of preparation and failure to provide evidence. Proper preparation is key for a successful evaluation; it involves gathering relevant information, documenting achievements, and understanding the performance standards. When individuals do not prepare adequately, they may find themselves unable to support their performance claims with concrete examples or data, which could lead to an inaccurate or unfair evaluation of their contributions.

Providing evidence is essential because it substantiates the claims made in the evaluation. Evaluators typically look for clear examples of how an individual met or exceeded the established performance standards, as this adds credibility to the evaluation. Without evidence, even the most skilled performers might struggle to convey their value effectively.

On the other hand, options that mention over-communicating with evaluators, ignoring performance standards, or focusing solely on numerical scores relate to different aspects of the evaluation process. While these might represent less than ideal approaches, they do not carry the same level of critical importance as being prepared and evidencing performance, which is foundational to a fair and thorough evaluation. Thus, avoiding the lack of preparation and failure to provide evidence is crucial for ensuring success in the JEPES evaluation process.